Sunday, April 14, 2013

Build It, and They Will Come

 

Or will they ?

Patient Engagement Is A Physician-Patient Communication Challenge…Not A Health Information Technology Challenge

The Mayo Clinic’s patient portal experience  was discussed at a HIMSS 2013.

I hate saying I told you so.  But “patient engagement is a physician-patient communications challenge and not an HIT (health information technology) challenge.  (Steve Wilkins, MPH in KevinMD)

The headline: “Mayo Clinic struggles to meet stage 2 meaningful use thresholds for engaging patients.”

Always innovating, the Mayo Clinic some three years ago introduced a web-based portal to share information with their patients.  During that time some 240,000 patients have signed up for online accounts.  That’s pretty impressive.  But there’s a problem.

According to Eric Manley, product manager of global solutions at the Mayo Clinic, they are having a hard time getting more than 5% of all the patients who registered with the patient portal to actually use it. You see in order to meet Stage 2 meaningful use requirements, and enjoy the benefits that come with meeting this criteria, people actually have to use the portal to access their own health information.  You just can’t build a portal and in Mayo’s case have fewer than 12,000 unique patients actually use it.

So what went wrong?

It’s not like the folks at Mayo haven’t tried.  Mayo’s patient portal offer all the requisite techie gizmos – giving patients access to their medical record, lab results, appointment schedule, and lots of health information.  They also recently introduced their first patient-directed mobile health app called “Patient” which makes it easy for people to access their health information online.   Mayo even has a Center for Innovation to figure this kind of stuff out.

Upon reflection, Manley admits that “simply making services available doesn’t cut it.”

“Unless you are engaging patients, you won’t meet meaningful use requirements. [Messaging and other mechanisms] need to be a part of your practice.”

Manley is quoted as saying that “patient engagement has been a part of what Mayo has done for a long time.  Meaningful use, especially Stage 2, is a catalyst to kick it up a notch.”

Let’s face it.  Meaningful use maybe a good way to get providers to adopt badly needed HIT improvements – but it not a great way to force patients to engage with you.

So what is the solution?

There’s no question that if done right patient portals can and do work.  One need look no further than Kaiser Permanente, Group Health and the VA for great examples.  The key to their success is integration.

Health care for patients occurs within the context of social relations with our physicians.  To be engaging the information you want to share with us needs to be relevant to us from our perspective, come from our physician and be integrated into our overall care plan.  Only then will we have the trust and confidence that the information is ours, and is something we need to pay attention to.  We focus on our health while we are in the doctor’s office.  If you really want to engage patients, do it there.

http://healthecommunications.files.wordpress.com/2013/04/pinnicle-of-patient-centered-communications1.jpg

Steve Wilkins is a former hospital executive and consumer health behavior researcher who blogs at Mind The Gap.

Building a patient portal may not engage your patients, but smart health messaging is a hook from you to the patient.  The physician must initiate the encounter and/or introduce the investment that they make. 

No comments:

Post a Comment