The digital health space refers to the integration of technology and health care services to improve the overall quality of health care delivery. It encompasses a wide range of innovative and emerging technologies such as wearables, telehealth, artificial intelligence, mobile health, and electronic health records (EHRs). The digital health space offers numerous benefits such as improved patient outcomes, increased access to health care, reduced costs, and improved communication and collaboration between patients and health care providers. For example, patients can now monitor their vital signs such as blood pressure and glucose levels from home using wearable devices and share the data with their doctors in real-time. Telehealth technology allows patients to consult with their health care providers remotely without having to travel to the hospital, making health care more accessible, particularly in remote or rural areas. Artificial intelligence can be used to analyze vast amounts of patient data to identify patterns, predict outcomes, and provide personalized treatment recommendations. Overall, the digital health space is rapidly evolving, and the integration of technology in health

Tuesday, March 10, 2015

The Future of Medicine lies in Human Capital

Innovation Is Sweeping Through U.S. Medical Schools

Preparing doctors—and in greater numbers—for new technologies and methods has only recently been  put in the forefront of health reform. Without an increase in efficiency and primary care physicians offering insurance is meaningless without having access to the care. The Wall Street Journal  features an article on the changes coming to Medical Schools.


Century-Old Model
Medical educators say such innovations are long overdue. The U.S. health-care system is rapidly becoming ever more data-driven, evidence-based, patient-centered and value-oriented. But for reasons having to do with tradition, accreditation concerns and preparing students for national board exams, the designers of medical-school curricula have been slow to shift their focus.
“The reality is that most medical schools are teaching the same way they did one hundred years ago,” says Wyatt Decker, chief executive of the Mayo Clinic’s operations in Arizona, which include a medical school in Scottsdale, Ariz., that is scheduled to enroll its first class in 2017. “It’s time to blow up that model and ask, ‘How do we want to train tomorrow’s doctors?’ ”
Doctors today are well schooled in the science of medicine, says Susan Skochelak, the American Medical Association’s vice president for medical education. “What’s been missing is the science of health-care delivery. How do you manage chronic disease? How do you focus on prevention and wellness? How do you work in a team?”

To encourage med schools to move their curricula in that direction, an AMA initiative called Accelerating Change in Medical Education is giving $1 million to each of 11 schools to help fund novel programs. Of the nation’s 141 medical schools, 118 competed for the 11 grants.
“We should have done this 10 years ago,” Dr. Decker says of the many med school changes. Then he quotes a Chinese proverb: “The best time to plant a tree is 20 years ago. The next best time is tomorrow.”


At the new Hofstra North Shore-LIJ School of Medicine in Hempstead, N.Y, students spend their first eight weeks not in lecture classes but becoming certified emergency medical technicians, learning split-second lifesaving skills on 911 calls.

At Penn State College of Medicine in Hershey, Pa., first-year students work as “patient navigators,” helping the ill, injured and their families traverse the often-confusing medical system and experiencing it from their perspective.
At New York University School of Medicine, one required course delves into a database that tracks every hospital admission and charge in the state. Discussions center on why, say, the average tab for delivering a baby is $3,000 in a rural area and $22,000 in New York City.
Century-Old Model
Medical educators say such innovations are long overdue. The U.S. health-care system is rapidly becoming ever more data-driven, evidence-based, patient-centered and value-oriented. But for reasons having to do with tradition, accreditation concerns and preparing students for national board exams, the designers of medical-school curricula have been slow to shift their focus.
Doctors today are well schooled in the science of medicine, says Susan Skochelak, the American Medical Association’s vice president for medical education. “What’s been missing is the science of health-care delivery. How do you manage chronic disease? How do you focus on prevention and wellness? How do you work in a team?”
New MCAT
To that end, in April, a new MCAT—the Medical College Admission Test—will be administered, the test’s first major revision since 1991. The new version is 2 hours longer (6 hours and 30 minutes) and tests knowledge of behavioral and social sciences as well as biology, physics and chemistry. One sample question has applicants read a passage, then asks which of four statements “is most consistent with the sociological paradigm of symbolic interactionism?”
Styles of teaching and learning are also changing.
“We’ve replaced ‘the sage on the stage’ with ‘the guide on the side,’ ” says Richard Zimmerman, a neurosurgeon and medical director for education for the new Mayo med school in Scottsdale.
At both the new school and Mayo’s existing medical school in Rochester, Minn., much of the material traditionally taught in lecture classes will be converted to electronic formats that students can absorb on their own, leaving class time for discussions and case studies.
Mayo also is creating a new course of study, called the Science of Health Care Delivery, which will run through all four years and include health-care economics, biomedical informatics and systems engineering. With a few additional credits, students can graduate with both an M.D. and a master’s in health-care delivery from Arizona State University.
In a course called Checkbook, Mayo students will track all of the services provided to their assigned patients during clinical rotations and look for redundancies or routine tests that add little value.
Focus on Teams

Learning to work in teams is a main focus at Mayo—and a sharp departure from traditional training for doctors.
“The old model was, you’d go on rounds; the attending would ask a question, and the young resident had to get the right answer,” says Dr. Decker in Scottsdale. “In the new model, you’re part of a team, and somebody else might have the right answer.”
To understand the roles of team members who aren’t doctors, first-year Mayo students spend half-days shadowing clinic schedulers, registered nurses, nurse practitioners and physician assistants. They also assist in managing a panel of patients, as care coordinators do. For example, they review records to see which diabetes patients aren’t managing their health well; they call the patients on the phone to discuss why they are struggling; then the students consult with the patients’ primary-care doctors to determine the next steps.
Managing Stress: Med Student Well Being Index,
In another departure from med schools past, Mayo is making an organized effort to help students avoid burnout. Classes in the first two years are pass/fail, not graded, and students can evaluate their level of stress, fatigue and risk of suicide in a confidential Med Student Well Being Index,
Less Memorization
What’s being left out of medical education to make room for the new material?
Some schools are placing far less emphasis on memorizing facts, such as which drugs do what and how they interact with other drugs. Such information is now readily available electronically.
“The fund of medical knowledge is now growing and changing too fast for humans to keep up with, and the facts you memorize today might not be relevant five years from now,” says NYU’s Dr. Triola. Instead, what’s important is teaching “information-seeking behavior,” he says, such as what sources to trust and how to avoid information overload.
Technology
Is also changing how med students learn. Simulators that look like patients and can be programmed to go into cardiac arrest, have strokes, spike fevers, cry, vomit and eliminate are particularly useful for teaching.

Some schools are condensing the typical four-year curriculum into three years, to let students start their residencies sooner and graduate with less debt. 
We should have done this 10 years ago,” Dr. Decker says of the many med school changes. Then he quotes a Chinese proverb: 
“The best time to plant a tree is 20 years ago. The next best time is tomorrow.”
The Future of Medicine lies in Human Capital




The Future of Medicine

There are many 'futurists' forecasting what will develop in the next decade.

Early on in the 21st century we have witnessed the acceptance of electronic health records, health information exchanges, big data and analytics, the development of health care social media, #hcsm, digital communication, mobile health and hardware advances such as Smartwatch

Among these published and verbal futurists are Eric Topol M.D.  Bertalan Mesko,





Not only  is the  Future of Medicine dealing with Health Reform and Health Information Technology Advances, perhaps the greatest changes will be in  human capital. Medical schools are revising curricula which has had the same format since 1910.



Monday, March 9, 2015

Health Information Exchange development slows

Opinion: Government Intervention Will Not Fix Interoperability Issues


In response to a recent article by Republican senators on HITECH Act spending, Brookings Institution fellow Niam Yaraghi writes that he agrees that the health care IT system is not performing well but argues that Congress should turn to private-sector innovators to enhance interoperability rather than government regulations and standards. Brookings Institution's "TechTank."
ONC may have set the standards, however private enterprise is balking at the task due to poor economic models and lack of real financial incentives, savings, or better outcomes.
In a blog post on the Brookings Institution's "TechTank," Niam Yaraghi, a fellow at the Brookings Institution's Center for Technology Innovation, responds to a Health Affairs blog post by five Republican senators that questioned the success of the HITECH Act.Yaraghi writes, "While I agree with the senators that the health care IT system is currently not performing well, I do not believe they have realistic expectations for [the Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT]." He adds, "HITECH was designed with a lack of insight into how the health care market functions, and thus billions of dollars were doomed to be wasted and have no tangible return from the very first day."
Yaraghi recommends redirecting the remaining $7 billion in HITECH funds "toward incenting innovation." He concludes that Congress should look to the private sector for proposals that "provide a technical solution for interoperability" and "design business strategies in which different members of the market willingly contribute to information exchange" (Yaraghi, "TechTank," Brookings Institution, 3/5).
On April 16, 2013, we released “REBOOT: Re-examining the Strategies Needed to Successfully Adopt Health IT,” outlining concerns with implementation of the Health Information Technology and Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act. Specifically, we asked: What have the American people gotten for their $35 billion dollar investment?
Two years after releasing the white paper, and six years since enactment of the HITECH Act, the question remains. There is inconclusive evidence that the program has achieved its goals of increasing efficiency, reducing costs, and improving the quality of care.
We have been candid about the key reason for the lackluster performance of this stimulus program: the lack of progress toward interoperability. Countless electronic health record vendors, hospital leaders, physicians, researchers, and thought leaders have told us time and again that interoperability is necessary to achieve the promise of a more efficient health system for patients, providers, and taxpayers.
Instead, according to physician surveys, electronic health records (EHRs) are a leading cause of anxiety for physicians across the country. The EHR products are not meaningful to physicians, which is clear when you consider that half of all physicians will have their Medicare payments cut in 2015 for not adopting government benchmarks for EHRs.
The Nationwide-Interoperability-Roadmap was outlined along with HITECH ACT.  It had lofty goals but was and still is disjointed with marked differences in implementation across the country.
Instead, according to physician surveys, electronic health records (EHRs) are a leading cause of anxiety for physicians across the country. The EHR products are not meaningful to physicians, which is clear when you consider that half of all physicians will have their Medicare payments cut in 2015 for not adopting government benchmarks for EHRs.

Mental Health Professionals Debate Use of EHRs, Incentives

Physician Rankings, Ratings and Reviews

Today the rapidity of electronic communications creates the good possibility that your online ratings may fluctuate like the online trading tickers of the stock exchanges.



Physicians who do not check their ratings on a number of web sites are sticking their heads in the sands. Regardless of how well you think your rank, an ill mannered employee could sabotage your reputation online by a unhappy unsatisfied or even a malicious patient.

No one can prevent all negative reviews, however reviews must be monitored by a member of your staff regularly.

The most visible provider ranking and rating sites are:


The researchers evaluated four rating sites that rank or grade hospitals across the country:

There are now services that will regularly scan up to   different rating sites and report their findings on a daily basis whenever a new review is posted.

Which sites matter?    There are 75+ major websites where patients can see reviews for doctors. Even though a website may not have a popular brand name like "Yellow Pages," it still can impact your reputation if it shows up when patients Google your name.

Review Report Card® helps you keep track of your reviews on 75+ websites in a single glance. We do over 1,000 unique searches for you online and alert you every day new reviews are discovered. In addition to monitoring your reviews, you will be notified if your address is correct on each of the 75+ sites.
Patient Review Templates will help you boost your positive reviews. We recommend that you customize the templates and send them to patients between 24 to 48 hours after their appointment. The templates contain directions and hyperlinks they can follow to endorse you on each site.

A Harvard Business Review analyzed the effects of reviews (restaurants), 

and while not directly related to healthcare it does 

give some estimate of the 

power of negative evaluations 

Comparing the cost of monitoring your reviews may 

pale in comparison to the damage to reputation or 

income if negative reviews are missed.