The digital health space refers to the integration of technology and health care services to improve the overall quality of health care delivery. It encompasses a wide range of innovative and emerging technologies such as wearables, telehealth, artificial intelligence, mobile health, and electronic health records (EHRs). The digital health space offers numerous benefits such as improved patient outcomes, increased access to health care, reduced costs, and improved communication and collaboration between patients and health care providers. For example, patients can now monitor their vital signs such as blood pressure and glucose levels from home using wearable devices and share the data with their doctors in real-time. Telehealth technology allows patients to consult with their health care providers remotely without having to travel to the hospital, making health care more accessible, particularly in remote or rural areas. Artificial intelligence can be used to analyze vast amounts of patient data to identify patterns, predict outcomes, and provide personalized treatment recommendations. Overall, the digital health space is rapidly evolving, and the integration of technology in health

Friday, May 1, 2015

IOM Was Right on Health IT and Patient Safety

The Evidence Shows IOM Was Right on Health IT and Patient Safety


April 27, 2015, 10:00 am / Andrew Gettinger, M.D. / Chief Medical Information Officer, Acting Director, Office of Clinical Quality and Safety , and
Kathy Kenyon, J.D. / Senior Policy Analyst
The potential for health IT to reduce errors has been a pillar of health policy on patient safety since the Institute of Medicine’s To Err is Human(2000) and Crossing the Quality Chasm (2001).  In 2012, in Health IT and Patient Safety: Building Safer Systems for Better Care the IOM found the evidence on the impact of health IT on patient safety was “mixed.”  Since then, whether health IT actually improves patient safety has remained an open question.
The nation has seen widespread adoption of health IT as a result of the Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs.  With that increase in adoption, there should be more and better evidence on the actual impact of health IT on safety.  Health IT should raise the floor on patient safety, and the evidence shows that it has.

Institute of Medicine and Health IT in Redesigned Systems of Care
To add perspective, it’s useful to recall that in 2000 the IOM promoted health IT as part of “redesigned systems of care.” The IOM found that the large number of avoidable deaths identified inTo Err is Human could not be decreased by trying harder in the same old (paper-based) healthcare system. The IOM explained, “Health care has safety and quality problems because it relies on outmoded systems of work. Poor designs set the workforce up to fail, regardless of how hard they try. If we want safer, higher-quality care, we will need to have redesigned systems of care, including the use of information technology to support clinical and administrative processes.”
Health IT is not and never will be a “silver bullet” that reduces unsafe conditions, errors, and adverse events. To improve safety and quality, health IT is an important part of delivery system reform and redesigned systems of care. Health IT, when well designed and implemented, is a tool that can help health information flow in ways that allow for improvements in patient health and safety. Whatever the drawbacks to health IT systems, the evidence suggests that health IT has raised the floor on safety. At ONC, we are committed to working with clinicians, health care organizations, and health IT developers who share a commitment to making care safer and better by continuously improving the safety and safe use of health IT.
It is good to know that the evidence, so far, suggests that the IOM was right back in 2000. We should be going down this path. The widespread adoption of health IT has been a clear benefit to patient safety. We need to continue to work on making health IT even better in a redesigned health system with patient safety and quality its first priority.

he Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC) convenes the first joint meeting of the Health Information Technology Policy and Standards Committees. We intend to spend the day discussing interoperability in the health information ecosystem.
Committee members will hear a final report from the Joint Jason Task Force, an update from the Interoperability Governance Sub-Committee and an interim report from ONC’s Interoperability Portfolio Manager. These presentations mark several months of dedicated work developing a more detailed, shared roadmap to achieve interoperability in this nation, as a means to see that everyone has access to better quality, more affordable care and better health overall.
These conversations follow our release, in June of 2014, of the high-level document Connecting Health and Care for the Nation: A 10-Year Vision to Achieve an Interoperable Health IT Infrastructure.  This paper describes ONC’s broad vision and framework to develop a clear pathway towards interoperability. It is intended as an invitation to health IT stakeholders – clinicians, consumers, hospitals, public health, technology developers, payers, researchers, policy makers and many others – to join ONC to develop a defined, shared roadmap that would allow us to collectively achieve health IT interoperability as a core foundational element of a learning health system.

Not withstanding the aforementioned positive findings; the following is a caveat regarding EHR and HIT usage.

Industry Reaction Mixed to Joint Commission's Health IT Warning

A recent Joint Commission sentinel event alert that warned health IT can pose risks to patients has received mixed reaction from stakeholders, Health Data Management reports (Slabodkin, Health Data Management, 4/22).

Background

The alert -- which was issued last month -- stated that EHRs "introduce new kinds of risks into an already complex health care environment where both technical and social factors must be considered."
The alert cited an analysis of event reports received by the Joint Commission showing that between Jan. 1, 2010, and June 30, 2013, hospitals reported 120 health IT-related adverse events. Of those errors:
  • About 33% stemmed from human-computer interface usability problems;
  • 24% stemmed from health IT support communication issues; and
  • 23% stemmed from clinical content-related design or data issues.
The alert recommended:
  • Implementing comprehensive systematic analysis of all adverse events to determine whether they were the result of health IT issues; and
  • Limiting the number of patient records that can be displayed on the same screen at once (iHealthBeat, 4/1).

Study: EHR Systems Lack Adequate Lab Data Graphing Functions

Brookings Report Finds Significant Gaps in EHR Interoperability


Health Information Technology: Where We Stand And Where We Need To

Karen B. DeSalvo, M.D., M.P.H., M.Sc.

Karen DeSalvo, M.D., M.P.H., M.Sc., the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology, discusses her view of the health information technology landscape. She outlines an agenda for her office that includes incentivizing interoperability, “standardizing standards,” and establishing shared expectations and actions around data security and privacy. This post, which also appears on Health Affairs Blog, is based on Dr. DeSalvo’s presentation at the Health Information and Management Systems Society 2015 annual conference last week.

Blocking of health information undermines health system interoperability and delivery reform

April 10, 2015, 7:29 am / Karen B. DeSalvo, M.D., M.P.H., M.Sc.
The secure, appropriate, and efficient sharing of electronic health information is the foundation of an interoperable learning health system—one that uses information and technology to deliver better care, spend health dollars more wisely, and advance the health of everyone.

Robert Wood Johnson Foundation releases Data for Health: Learning What Works

April 2, 2015, 12:36 pm / Karen B. DeSalvo, M.D., M.P.H., M.Sc.
The Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC) is committed to advancing an interoperable learning health system that impacts individual, community and population health. To achieve this goal in the next several years will require collective action from all public and private stakeholders, including consumers and community-based groups outside of what is traditionally considered the expected set of technology and health care entities.

New ONC Grant Funding Opportunities Help Advance Health IT in Communities and Workforce Training

February 3, 2015, 4:47 pm / Karen B. DeSalvo, M.D., M.P.H., M.Sc.
ONC has released a funding opportunity announcement designed to strengthen the health IT workforce and build on work done by the 17 Beacon Communities to innovate health care delivery with the goal of building a learning health system, as outlined in the recently posted Shared Nationwide Interoperability Roadmap. These initiatives are part of the Department of Health and Human Services’ efforts to achieve better care, smarter savings and healthier people.

HHS and ONC invest $28 Million in Health Information Exchange Grants

February 3, 2015, 10:00 am / Karen B. DeSalvo, M.D., M.P.H., M.Sc.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Sylvia Burwell announced this morning an important Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC) funding opportunity, which is part of a Department-wide effort to achieve the safe and secure exchange and use of electronic health information to improve health and transform care as outlined in the Shared Nationwide Interoperability Roadmap, Connecting Health and Care for the Nation: A Shared Nationwide Interoperability Roadmap Version 1.0.

Thursday, April 30, 2015

#‎NoMUwithoutMe. Has the Patient been Left Out ?


There is now a debate raging over ‪#‎NoMUwithoutMe.  Several patient advocates have been swept up in a debate over a non-issue regarding meaningful use.  The  term itself is meaningless to most physicians.

To what group does meaningful use apply ?  Is it providers, analysts, medicare, or patients>? The group caught in the middle are the vendors.  That is where the rubber meets the road…

Several  hundred providers have already adapted stage I of meaningful use, while there has been more reticence to adopt stage II .

The artificial incendiary action was CMS proposal to shorten the attestation period from one year to 90 days for the next stage of M.U.  This, in response to provider pushback regarding the overwhelming confluence of conversion to ICD-10, something effecting every EHR. Many are saying to hell with the incentive, I’d rather get penalized. The increase of time, loss of efficiency and investment of more capital does not equate with better medical care.

new-adrian-gropper.png

According to Adrian Groper M.D. writing in The Health Care Blog…..the patient is being left out of the end game and recipient of their own health data.  Some of this becomes highly technical as to what a patient can download from a patient portal.

To quote Dr. Groper,

“Meaningful Use (MU) requirement for Stage 3, in the final stage of a $30B + initiative to advance interoperable digital health records. The focus is on something called View / Download / Transmit (V/D/T) but the real issue and the Last Chance is broader and more important. The bad news is that MU may leave patients as beggars for own data. The good news is that the Office of the National Coordinator (ONC)  and Congress are paying attention and patients still have a chance to shift the terms of the debate to what HIPAA calls “the patient’s right of access” and demand that it apply strictly to MU Stage 3 Appication Programming Interfaces (API).”

So, at this point in time MU stage III is dead on arrival with a required re-definition of what it will require from software APIs.

What makes this even more interesting is that many large health systems have already included MU III in their new software.  Large healthcare systems have considerable capital to send to software vendors, in contrast to smaller hospitals and medical groups.

Meaingful use has become fodder for the software industry, and does need to be re-directed toward patients. The bottom line is if it ain’t good for the patient/provider….don’t do it. Primum non nocere.

Tuesday, April 28, 2015

Medical Informatics World Conference Will Unite Healthcare and IT Leaders to Address Solutions for Prevalent Industry Issues and Common Pain Points

Cambridge Healthtech Institute and Clinical Informatics News today announced that its third annual Medical Informatics World Conference will take place May 4-5, 2015 at the Renaissance Waterfront Hotel in Boston. This professional forum will focus on the cross-industry connections and innovative solutions needed to take biomedical research and healthcare delivery to the next level.
Connecting more than 400 healthcare, biomedical science, health informatics and IT leaders, the 2015 Medical Informatics World Conference will navigate the emerging trends and opportunities in the ever-evolving industry. The event responds to the challenges in collaborating and maximizing the benefits of enabling technologies, offering inspiring keynotes combined with focused expert-led presentations and discussion. The 2015 program features six conference tracks, including two that are new to this year's event -- which will focus on mHealth and the cloud and enterprise architecture and hospital information systems.
"The healthcare technology and policy landscape changes so rapidly that IT leaders are challenged to deploy solutions fast enough to meet user and regulatory needs," said John Halamka, M.D., MS, CIO, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center. "Medical Informatics World convenes experts from across the country to share best practices, providing the guidance we all need to be successful."

A Focus on Healthcare Reform, Emerging Policies and Patient Data Sharing Will Provide Attendees With Real-Life Case Studies and Best Practices

Featured tracks include:
  • Provider-Payer-Pharma Cross-Industry Data Collaboration to Enable Value-Based Delivery Models - Integrating real time data analysis to manage costs and improve outcomes in the health care ecosystem.
  • Coordinated Patient Care, Engagement and Empowerment - Delivering care to patients and consumers in all settings to improve outcomes.
  • Population Health Management and Quality Improvement- Using technology and analytics to predict outcomes, target high-risk populations and increase compliance.
  • Security and Access of Healthcare Data for Patients, Providers and Payers, Anywhere and Anytime - Navigating the evolving landscape of health data in a BYOD, cloud and increasingly regulated environment.
  • Leveraging mHealth, Telehealth and the Cloud - Achieving the "triple aim" with mobile tech, POC devices, wearables and telemedicine.
  • Building Enterprise Architecture and Hospital Information Systems to Improve Outcomes - Delivering data-driven infrastructures to support clinical and financial transformation.
"As this event continues to grow year over year and gain considerable traction in the market, we are constantly looking to raise the bar for attendees by bringing fresh ideas and topics combined with leading speakers to the forefront," said Micah Lieberman, Executive Director of Conferences for CHI and Medical Informatics World. " 

Medical Informatics World Conference Will Unite Healthcare and IT Leaders to Address Solutions for Prevalent Industry Issues and Common Pain Points