Meaningful Confusion II, and III

Meaningful Use Lives On

As promised in one of my last posts, MEANINGFUL USE IS DEAD, this is the whole story...so far.

Acting Director of CMS,  Andy Slavitt's most recent statement regarding meaningful use was unclear. 

by Brian Ahier, iHealthBeat, Tuesday, January 19, 2016

On Oct. 6, 2015, CMS and the Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT released the final rules for Stage 3 of the Electronic Health Record Incentive Program and the 2015 Edition Health IT Certification Criteria. Through this rulemaking, the agencies hoped to simplify requirements and add some new flexibilities for providers. They moved from fiscal year to calendar year reporting for all providers beginning in 2015, and they offered a 90-day reporting period for all providers in 2015, for new participants in 2016 and 2017, and for any provider moving to Stage 3 in 2017. They reduced the number of Stage 2 meaningful use objectives from 18 to 10 in 2015-2017, with no change in clinical quality measures. For Stage 3, there will be eight meaningful use objectives (with about 60% of them requiring interoperability).

They also requested additional feedback about Stage 3 of the EHR Incentive Program going forward, in particular with the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (MACRA), which established the Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) and consolidated certain aspects of a number of quality measurement and federal incentive programs into one more efficient framework. They plan to use this feedback to inform future policy developments for the EHR Incentive Program, as well as consider it during rulemaking to implement MACRA, which is expected to take place in the spring of 2016.

During last week's J.P. Morgan Healthcare Conference, CMS acting Administrator Andy Slavitt made some comments that threw the health IT industry into a tizzy about the future of the meaningful use program.
He said:

"The meaningful use program, as it has existed, will now be effectively over and replaced with something better. Since late last year we have been working side by side with physician organizations across many communities -- including with great advocacy from the [American Medical Association] -- and have listened to the needs and concerns of many. We will be putting out the details on this next stage over the next few months, but I will give you themes guiding our implementation.
For one, the focus will move away from rewarding providers for the use of technology and towards the outcome they achieve with their patients.
Second, providers will be able to customize their goals so tech companies can build around the individual practice needs, not the needs of the government. Technology must be user-centered and support physicians, not distract them.
Third, one way to aid this is by leveling the technology playing field for start-ups and new entrants. We are requiring open APIs [so] the physician desktop can be opened up and move away from the lock that early EHR decisions placed on physician organizations [to] allow apps, analytic tools and connected technologies to get data in and out of an EHR securely.
And finally, we are deadly serious about interoperability. We will begin initiatives in collaboration with physicians and consumers toward pointing technology to fill critical use cases like closing referral loops and engaging a patient in their care. And technology companies that look for ways to practice 'data blocking' in opposition to new regulations will find that it won't be tolerated."
A careful parsing of his statement does not lead to the conclusion that meaningful use as a construct is over, rather that it is being absorbed into MIPS. The program is designed to shift Medicare reimbursement from fee-for-service to pay-for-performance.

How MIPS Works
Starting in 2018, payments under the new system would be adjusted based on performance in the new MIPS incentive system, which consolidates three incentive programs:

• The Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS), which provides incentives for physicians to report on the quality of care measures;
• The Value-Based Payment Modifier (VBM), which adjusts payment based on quality use of resources; and
• Meaningful use of certified EHRs.

There are four categories that will be used to asses performance under MIPS:

• Quality -- In addition to measures used in the existing quality performance programs (PQRS, VBM, meaningful use), HHS will develop additional measures.
• Resource Use -- The resource use category will include measures used in the current VBM program.
• Meaningful Use -- Certified health IT will be required in order to get credit in this category.
• Clinical Practice Improvement Activities -- Professionals will be assessed on their efforts to engage in clinical practice improvement activities. Incorporation of this new component gives credit to professionals working to improve their practices and facilitates future participation in alternative payment models.

Meaningful use accounts for 25% of the scoring towards reimbursement under MIPS. The current EHR meaningful use requirements, demonstrated by use of a certified system, will continue to apply in order to receive credit towards incentives in the new system. However, to prevent duplicative reporting, professionals who report quality measures through certified EHR systems for the MIPS quality category are deemed to meet the meaningful use clinical quality measure component. The scoring breakdown is as follows:

The law provides flexibility to participate in MIPS in a way that best suits a particular practice environment. These options could include:

• Use of EHRs;
• Use of qualified clinical data registries maintained by physician specialty organizations; and
• Being assessed as a group, as a "virtual" group, or with an affiliated hospital or facility.

Meaningful Use Going Forward

This next year will be very busy as the rules for implementing the program are released.
Note that Slavitt said the meaningful use program as it has existed will now be effectively over. But meaningful use as a means of measuring progress is still required to receive payments from CMS above the baseline. There has been basic agreement among stakeholders that the EHR Incentive Program as it is currently constructed has achieved the goal of widespread EHR adoption and laid a strong foundation for interoperability.

The recent letter from 31 large health systems (posted on John Halamka's blog) to HHS Secretary Sylvia Matthews Burwell asking the agency to reconsider Stage 3 meaningful use will apply additional pressure for change.

There has been some frustration expressed by physician groups that meaningful use is slowing them down and ultimately not improving care. Many commenters have said that it is time to move beyond process measures and begin measuring outcomes. This requires new thinking and workflows. CMS and commercial payers have made strong commitments to move away from fee for service into paying for value. The technology foundation established through the meaningful use and other programs would help achieve these goals.

MACRA also eliminates penalties in the EHR Incentive Program after 2017 to be replaced by the payment structure within MIPS. And finally, on December 28, 2015 President Obama signed the Patient Access and Medicare Protection Act, which among other provisions will provide flexibility in applying for a meaningful use hardship exception. This means that CMS no longer has to deal with the exemptions on a case-by-case basis. It also extends the timeframes to apply to apply for an exception.

According to the latest data from CMS almost 209,000 doctors and other health care providers will receive 2% cuts in their Medicare payments in 2016 for failing to meet meaningful use standards in 2014. Hardship exceptions will give relief and allow providers to pivot towards MIPS and alternative payment models. We may finally be reaching a tipping point in the transformation to paying for quality instead of quantity of care.

Source: iHealthBeat, Tuesday, January 19, 2016