The digital health space refers to the integration of technology and health care services to improve the overall quality of health care delivery. It encompasses a wide range of innovative and emerging technologies such as wearables, telehealth, artificial intelligence, mobile health, and electronic health records (EHRs). The digital health space offers numerous benefits such as improved patient outcomes, increased access to health care, reduced costs, and improved communication and collaboration between patients and health care providers. For example, patients can now monitor their vital signs such as blood pressure and glucose levels from home using wearable devices and share the data with their doctors in real-time. Telehealth technology allows patients to consult with their health care providers remotely without having to travel to the hospital, making health care more accessible, particularly in remote or rural areas. Artificial intelligence can be used to analyze vast amounts of patient data to identify patterns, predict outcomes, and provide personalized treatment recommendations. Overall, the digital health space is rapidly evolving, and the integration of technology in health

Tuesday, March 10, 2015

The Future of Medicine

There are many 'futurists' forecasting what will develop in the next decade.

Early on in the 21st century we have witnessed the acceptance of electronic health records, health information exchanges, big data and analytics, the development of health care social media, #hcsm, digital communication, mobile health and hardware advances such as Smartwatch

Among these published and verbal futurists are Eric Topol M.D.  Bertalan Mesko,





Not only  is the  Future of Medicine dealing with Health Reform and Health Information Technology Advances, perhaps the greatest changes will be in  human capital. Medical schools are revising curricula which has had the same format since 1910.



Monday, March 9, 2015

Health Information Exchange development slows

Opinion: Government Intervention Will Not Fix Interoperability Issues


In response to a recent article by Republican senators on HITECH Act spending, Brookings Institution fellow Niam Yaraghi writes that he agrees that the health care IT system is not performing well but argues that Congress should turn to private-sector innovators to enhance interoperability rather than government regulations and standards. Brookings Institution's "TechTank."
ONC may have set the standards, however private enterprise is balking at the task due to poor economic models and lack of real financial incentives, savings, or better outcomes.
In a blog post on the Brookings Institution's "TechTank," Niam Yaraghi, a fellow at the Brookings Institution's Center for Technology Innovation, responds to a Health Affairs blog post by five Republican senators that questioned the success of the HITECH Act.Yaraghi writes, "While I agree with the senators that the health care IT system is currently not performing well, I do not believe they have realistic expectations for [the Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT]." He adds, "HITECH was designed with a lack of insight into how the health care market functions, and thus billions of dollars were doomed to be wasted and have no tangible return from the very first day."
Yaraghi recommends redirecting the remaining $7 billion in HITECH funds "toward incenting innovation." He concludes that Congress should look to the private sector for proposals that "provide a technical solution for interoperability" and "design business strategies in which different members of the market willingly contribute to information exchange" (Yaraghi, "TechTank," Brookings Institution, 3/5).
On April 16, 2013, we released “REBOOT: Re-examining the Strategies Needed to Successfully Adopt Health IT,” outlining concerns with implementation of the Health Information Technology and Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act. Specifically, we asked: What have the American people gotten for their $35 billion dollar investment?
Two years after releasing the white paper, and six years since enactment of the HITECH Act, the question remains. There is inconclusive evidence that the program has achieved its goals of increasing efficiency, reducing costs, and improving the quality of care.
We have been candid about the key reason for the lackluster performance of this stimulus program: the lack of progress toward interoperability. Countless electronic health record vendors, hospital leaders, physicians, researchers, and thought leaders have told us time and again that interoperability is necessary to achieve the promise of a more efficient health system for patients, providers, and taxpayers.
Instead, according to physician surveys, electronic health records (EHRs) are a leading cause of anxiety for physicians across the country. The EHR products are not meaningful to physicians, which is clear when you consider that half of all physicians will have their Medicare payments cut in 2015 for not adopting government benchmarks for EHRs.
The Nationwide-Interoperability-Roadmap was outlined along with HITECH ACT.  It had lofty goals but was and still is disjointed with marked differences in implementation across the country.
Instead, according to physician surveys, electronic health records (EHRs) are a leading cause of anxiety for physicians across the country. The EHR products are not meaningful to physicians, which is clear when you consider that half of all physicians will have their Medicare payments cut in 2015 for not adopting government benchmarks for EHRs.

Mental Health Professionals Debate Use of EHRs, Incentives

Physician Rankings, Ratings and Reviews

Today the rapidity of electronic communications creates the good possibility that your online ratings may fluctuate like the online trading tickers of the stock exchanges.



Physicians who do not check their ratings on a number of web sites are sticking their heads in the sands. Regardless of how well you think your rank, an ill mannered employee could sabotage your reputation online by a unhappy unsatisfied or even a malicious patient.

No one can prevent all negative reviews, however reviews must be monitored by a member of your staff regularly.

The most visible provider ranking and rating sites are:


The researchers evaluated four rating sites that rank or grade hospitals across the country:

There are now services that will regularly scan up to   different rating sites and report their findings on a daily basis whenever a new review is posted.

Which sites matter?    There are 75+ major websites where patients can see reviews for doctors. Even though a website may not have a popular brand name like "Yellow Pages," it still can impact your reputation if it shows up when patients Google your name.

Review Report Card® helps you keep track of your reviews on 75+ websites in a single glance. We do over 1,000 unique searches for you online and alert you every day new reviews are discovered. In addition to monitoring your reviews, you will be notified if your address is correct on each of the 75+ sites.
Patient Review Templates will help you boost your positive reviews. We recommend that you customize the templates and send them to patients between 24 to 48 hours after their appointment. The templates contain directions and hyperlinks they can follow to endorse you on each site.

A Harvard Business Review analyzed the effects of reviews (restaurants), 

and while not directly related to healthcare it does 

give some estimate of the 

power of negative evaluations 

Comparing the cost of monitoring your reviews may 

pale in comparison to the damage to reputation or 

income if negative reviews are missed.




Friday, March 6, 2015

The Uses for Health Care Social Media #hcsm

Many physicians have expressed a disinterest in social media. We all agree it must not be used for patient interaction because of HIPAA which prohibits sharing of patient information.

However during the past three years physician interest and use of social media has markedly increased.

Symplur Signals details how Health Care Social Media impacts health care and your medical practice.


More than 40% of consumers say that information found via social media affects the way they deal with their health. 

18 to 24 year olds are more than 2x as likely than 45 to 54 year olds to use social media for health-related discussions. - 



90% of respondents from 18 to 24 years of age said they would trust medical information shared by others on their social media networks.  (this amounts to mouth-to-mouth verbal referrals. Millenials use Social Media as true social interaction among friends. This provides an avenue for patient referrals, and must not be ignored. 21st Century medicine is far different than even three or four years ago.

30% of adults are likely to share information about their health on social media sites with other patients, 47% with doctors, 43% with hospitals, 38% with a health insurance company and 32% with a drug company.  



31% of health care professionals use social media for professional networking. - 




For a complete listing of the uses for health care social media

Data from Symplur